https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167711 Writ jurisdiction was declined because an effective statutory appeal was available against the assessment under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973. The petitioner had challenged an administrative communication concerning exemption for PVC pipes, but after the assessment order was passed, the court held that the assessment could be questioned through the statutory appellate scheme and therefore refused to exercise discretionary writ powers at that stage. The court also did not decide the substantive exemption-notification issue and left the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Jan 2015 22:09:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167711 Writ jurisdiction was declined because an effective statutory appeal was available against the assessment under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973. The petitioner had challenged an administrative communication concerning exemption for PVC pipes, but after the assessment order was passed, the court held that the assessment could be questioned through the statutory appellate scheme and therefore refused to exercise discretionary writ powers at that stage. The court also did not decide the substantive exemption-notification issue and left the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy in accordance with law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167711