<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 125 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254926</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals challenging the demand of interest by the Revenue, noting that the letter from the Additional Commissioner did not constitute an order subject to appeal. However, the appellant was granted the right to approach the department for proper adjudication following legal precedent for due process and legal recourse. The judgment highlighted the importance of adhering to legal principles and seeking adjudication in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2015 09:16:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 125 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254926</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals challenging the demand of interest by the Revenue, noting that the letter from the Additional Commissioner did not constitute an order subject to appeal. However, the appellant was granted the right to approach the department for proper adjudication following legal precedent for due process and legal recourse. The judgment highlighted the importance of adhering to legal principles and seeking adjudication in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>