<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 122 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254923</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the lower authorities to refund the pre-deposit made by the appellant promptly. The impugned order rejecting the refund claim as premature was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. The Adjudicating Authority was instructed to implement the order within 30 days of communication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2015 09:02:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 122 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254923</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the lower authorities to refund the pre-deposit made by the appellant promptly. The impugned order rejecting the refund claim as premature was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. The Adjudicating Authority was instructed to implement the order within 30 days of communication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>