<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 90 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254891</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the cases to the adjudicating authority, instructing it to provide the Assessees with the NLC statement and allow them to present their defense. The adjudicating authority was directed to issue necessary orders after affording the Assessees a fair hearing. All issues were left open for determination by the adjudicating authority. The appeals were allowed through remand, and all stay applications and cross-objections were resolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 90 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254891</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the cases to the adjudicating authority, instructing it to provide the Assessees with the NLC statement and allow them to present their defense. The adjudicating authority was directed to issue necessary orders after affording the Assessees a fair hearing. All issues were left open for determination by the adjudicating authority. The appeals were allowed through remand, and all stay applications and cross-objections were resolved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>