<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 84 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the interest demand of Rs. 1,87,005/- for irregularly taken credit but reduced the penalty under Rule 15(1) of CCR, 2004 from Rs. 62,04,375/- to Rs. 25,000/- following the doctrine of proportionality. The decision emphasized adherence to procedural requirements for credit availment and the necessity for penalties to align with the offense committed. The judgment reflects a balanced enforcement approach, considering specific case circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 15:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 84 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the interest demand of Rs. 1,87,005/- for irregularly taken credit but reduced the penalty under Rule 15(1) of CCR, 2004 from Rs. 62,04,375/- to Rs. 25,000/- following the doctrine of proportionality. The decision emphasized adherence to procedural requirements for credit availment and the necessity for penalties to align with the offense committed. The judgment reflects a balanced enforcement approach, considering specific case circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>