<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 78 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254879</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that questions related to the rate of duty or value of goods for assessment did not fall under its jurisdiction. The core issue of interpreting the relevant notification and its impact on duty payable did not permit the High Court&#039;s intervention. The appellant was granted liberty to pursue the matter in the proper forum, as the appeal was deemed not maintainable under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 78 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254879</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that questions related to the rate of duty or value of goods for assessment did not fall under its jurisdiction. The core issue of interpreting the relevant notification and its impact on duty payable did not permit the High Court&#039;s intervention. The appellant was granted liberty to pursue the matter in the proper forum, as the appeal was deemed not maintainable under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>