<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 74 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254875</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed duty against the company for manufacturing and clearing computers under a specific brand name, imposing a penalty of Rs. 5,00,000 on the Managing Director. The penalty was reduced to 25% in line with the proviso to Section 11AC as the duty was paid before the notice was issued. No separate penalty was imposed on the Managing Director due to the lack of mala fide intent and the company&#039;s prompt deposit of duty. The Tribunal upheld the demand and interest while reducing the penalty for the company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 15:40:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 74 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254875</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed duty against the company for manufacturing and clearing computers under a specific brand name, imposing a penalty of Rs. 5,00,000 on the Managing Director. The penalty was reduced to 25% in line with the proviso to Section 11AC as the duty was paid before the notice was issued. No separate penalty was imposed on the Managing Director due to the lack of mala fide intent and the company&#039;s prompt deposit of duty. The Tribunal upheld the demand and interest while reducing the penalty for the company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>