<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 73 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254874</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit cannot be denied solely on the basis of a delayed, uncorroborated third-party statement when contemporaneous documentary evidence supports receipt and movement of goods. Here, GRs and VAT-D3 forms showed transport and dispatch from the supplier to the assessee&#039;s premises, while no alternate source of procurement was established. The documentary record therefore prevailed over the transport operator&#039;s statement recorded after about three years, and the credit disallowance was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 15:39:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 73 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254874</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit cannot be denied solely on the basis of a delayed, uncorroborated third-party statement when contemporaneous documentary evidence supports receipt and movement of goods. Here, GRs and VAT-D3 forms showed transport and dispatch from the supplier to the assessee&#039;s premises, while no alternate source of procurement was established. The documentary record therefore prevailed over the transport operator&#039;s statement recorded after about three years, and the credit disallowance was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>