https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254871 The High Court entertained a Writ Petition challenging three payment directives, citing lack of compliance with natural justice principles in finalizing duty assessments. A differential duty liability of Rs. 50 Crores was disputed, with concerns over writ jurisdiction due to pending appeal remedy. The Court required a deposit of Rs. 5 Crores for a personal hearing and reasoned order within 12 weeks, with coercive recovery measures stayed for eight weeks. Adjudication was to be independent of the Writ Petition outcome, with no opinion on show cause notices expressed. en-us Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254871 The High Court entertained a Writ Petition challenging three payment directives, citing lack of compliance with natural justice principles in finalizing duty assessments. A differential duty liability of Rs. 50 Crores was disputed, with concerns over writ jurisdiction due to pending appeal remedy. The Court required a deposit of Rs. 5 Crores for a personal hearing and reasoned order within 12 weeks, with coercive recovery measures stayed for eight weeks. Adjudication was to be independent of the Writ Petition outcome, with no opinion on show cause notices expressed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254871