<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 48 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254849</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a full stay on the demand of Rs. 621.18 crores for A.Y. 2009-10. It found a prima-facie case that the TP addition and disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) were unjustified based on previous Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal also granted a stay on the disallowance u/s 14A due to the small amount involved. The assessee was directed not to alienate any immovable assets until the appeal&#039;s disposal, with conditions imposed to maintain the stay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 09:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 48 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254849</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a full stay on the demand of Rs. 621.18 crores for A.Y. 2009-10. It found a prima-facie case that the TP addition and disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) were unjustified based on previous Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal also granted a stay on the disallowance u/s 14A due to the small amount involved. The assessee was directed not to alienate any immovable assets until the appeal&#039;s disposal, with conditions imposed to maintain the stay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>