<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 856 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167700</link>
    <description>Screen printing designs on customer-supplied glazed tiles was treated as a processing activity rather than a sale of goods because ink, stains, colours, glaze, vitrosa and packing materials were consumables used to execute the work. Consequently, taxation of the entire turnover as works contract sale turnover was not justified. Even if the activity involved a transfer of property, supplies to out-of-State customers were inter-State in substance and could not be taxed in the attempted manner under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act. The provision concerning goods purchased outside the State for works-contract execution did not apply because the processor worked on and returned customer-owned tiles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 856 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167700</link>
      <description>Screen printing designs on customer-supplied glazed tiles was treated as a processing activity rather than a sale of goods because ink, stains, colours, glaze, vitrosa and packing materials were consumables used to execute the work. Consequently, taxation of the entire turnover as works contract sale turnover was not justified. Even if the activity involved a transfer of property, supplies to out-of-State customers were inter-State in substance and could not be taxed in the attempted manner under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act. The provision concerning goods purchased outside the State for works-contract execution did not apply because the processor worked on and returned customer-owned tiles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>