<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 762 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167670</link>
    <description>Conditional protection against coercive recovery was extended for entry tax on sugar purchased from units covered by the Sugar Industry Promotion Policy, 2004, because the exemption under the section 4B notification applied to non-levy sugar manufactured in new or expanded units subject to prescribed conditions, including production of a certificate from the assessing authority. The protection was made dependent on furnishing the requisite certificate and on the outcome of the connected writ petition concerning revocation of the policy, and the writ petition was disposed of without finally determining the underlying tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 07:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 762 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167670</link>
      <description>Conditional protection against coercive recovery was extended for entry tax on sugar purchased from units covered by the Sugar Industry Promotion Policy, 2004, because the exemption under the section 4B notification applied to non-levy sugar manufactured in new or expanded units subject to prescribed conditions, including production of a certificate from the assessing authority. The protection was made dependent on furnishing the requisite certificate and on the outcome of the connected writ petition concerning revocation of the policy, and the writ petition was disposed of without finally determining the underlying tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>