https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167665 The court held that refusal to interfere was unwarranted where the assessment rejected F forms as invalid without proper verification. The forms had corrections that were attested, and the appellant had produced confirmation from the Maharashtra sales tax authority on their genuineness. Because the assessing authority did not cross-check the forms with the counterpart authority, despite the established practice and administrative direction to do so before rejection, the matter was found to require reconsideration. The assessment order was quashed and the case remanded for fresh verification and a new decision after considering the certificate and, if necessary, obtaining further confirmation from Maharashtra. en-us Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Jan 2015 09:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167665 The court held that refusal to interfere was unwarranted where the assessment rejected F forms as invalid without proper verification. The forms had corrections that were attested, and the appellant had produced confirmation from the Maharashtra sales tax authority on their genuineness. Because the assessing authority did not cross-check the forms with the counterpart authority, despite the established practice and administrative direction to do so before rejection, the matter was found to require reconsideration. The assessment order was quashed and the case remanded for fresh verification and a new decision after considering the certificate and, if necessary, obtaining further confirmation from Maharashtra. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167665