<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 43 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254844</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Tax Appeal, affirming that the penalty beyond 25% under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, was rightly set aside. The judgment emphasized the significance of timely penalty payments and clarified the legal ramifications concerning penalty imposition in cases involving service tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 21:54:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 43 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254844</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Tax Appeal, affirming that the penalty beyond 25% under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, was rightly set aside. The judgment emphasized the significance of timely penalty payments and clarified the legal ramifications concerning penalty imposition in cases involving service tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>