<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 39 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254840</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, emphasized the need for proper compliance with pre-deposit orders to avoid dismissal, criticized the rejection of the appeal without due consideration of the modification application, highlighted the lack of opportunity for the appellants to present their case, and clarified that non-compliance with a pre-deposit order does not automatically lead to dismissal without issuing a show cause notice. The Tribunal set aside the initial order and instructed the Commissioner (Appeals) to reconsider the case, ensuring the appellants are given a fair opportunity to present their arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 21:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 39 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254840</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, emphasized the need for proper compliance with pre-deposit orders to avoid dismissal, criticized the rejection of the appeal without due consideration of the modification application, highlighted the lack of opportunity for the appellants to present their case, and clarified that non-compliance with a pre-deposit order does not automatically lead to dismissal without issuing a show cause notice. The Tribunal set aside the initial order and instructed the Commissioner (Appeals) to reconsider the case, ensuring the appellants are given a fair opportunity to present their arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>