https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167656 The appeal was competent despite the memorandum naming the Secretary, Ministry of Works and Housing, because the description was treated as nomenclature and the Union of India remained the real party under the Code of Civil Procedure and the Constitution. Delay in filing the special leave petition was condoned on the basis of a sufficient explanation for the late receipt of the High Court result and subsequent steps taken. The suit for declaration was barred by limitation because, under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, the right to sue accrued on the date of termination of the temporary employee's service, not on the later acquittal in the criminal case; the acquittal did not create a fresh cause of action. en-us Mon, 19 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Jan 2015 11:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167656 The appeal was competent despite the memorandum naming the Secretary, Ministry of Works and Housing, because the description was treated as nomenclature and the Union of India remained the real party under the Code of Civil Procedure and the Constitution. Delay in filing the special leave petition was condoned on the basis of a sufficient explanation for the late receipt of the High Court result and subsequent steps taken. The suit for declaration was barred by limitation because, under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, the right to sue accrued on the date of termination of the temporary employee's service, not on the later acquittal in the criminal case; the acquittal did not create a fresh cause of action. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167656