https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254830 The Tribunal upheld the department's findings on the issuance of bogus invoices without actual supply of goods by the appellant, a second stage dealer, and imposed penalties under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appellant was held liable for issuing fraudulent invoices and wrongly availing Cenvat credit. The penalty imposed was reduced based on the revised assessment of the Cenvat credit amount. en-us Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Jan 2015 13:39:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254830 The Tribunal upheld the department's findings on the issuance of bogus invoices without actual supply of goods by the appellant, a second stage dealer, and imposed penalties under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appellant was held liable for issuing fraudulent invoices and wrongly availing Cenvat credit. The penalty imposed was reduced based on the revised assessment of the Cenvat credit amount. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254830