<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 27 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254828</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit of CVD paid on design and testing charges separately shown in the bill of entry for imported moulds was held admissible. The customs assessment at the time of import was not disputed, and the mere segregation of those charges in the import documents did not show that they fell outside the assessable value of the moulds or that the duty paid on them was ineligible for credit. On that basis, denial of credit was not justified and the appellant&#039;s claim was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 13:33:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 27 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254828</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit of CVD paid on design and testing charges separately shown in the bill of entry for imported moulds was held admissible. The customs assessment at the time of import was not disputed, and the mere segregation of those charges in the import documents did not show that they fell outside the assessable value of the moulds or that the duty paid on them was ineligible for credit. On that basis, denial of credit was not justified and the appellant&#039;s claim was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>