https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254822 Prosecution evidence was found insufficient to disturb an acquittal under the NDPS Act because the claimed independent witnesses to the raid and seizure were either untraceable or not produced, and their purported signatures did not match the seizure memo and Section 67 statement. The seizure of currency at the residence was also not proved through reliable independent evidence, and the police witness did not support the prosecution version. The court accepted the trial court's view that the Section 67 statements were not shown to be voluntary, especially in light of the accused's injuries and the surrounding circumstances, so leave to appeal was declined and the acquittal remained undisturbed. en-us Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Jan 2015 12:53:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254822 Prosecution evidence was found insufficient to disturb an acquittal under the NDPS Act because the claimed independent witnesses to the raid and seizure were either untraceable or not produced, and their purported signatures did not match the seizure memo and Section 67 statement. The seizure of currency at the residence was also not proved through reliable independent evidence, and the police witness did not support the prosecution version. The court accepted the trial court's view that the Section 67 statements were not shown to be voluntary, especially in light of the accused's injuries and the surrounding circumstances, so leave to appeal was declined and the acquittal remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254822