<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254802</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal for statistical purposes only, emphasizing the need for a fair assessment based on the new evidences presented. The ITAT remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination based on the additional evidences and directed a thorough review to determine the legitimacy of the deposits. The judgment highlighted the importance of substantiated claims and thorough examination to ensure a just outcome in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254802</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal for statistical purposes only, emphasizing the need for a fair assessment based on the new evidences presented. The ITAT remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination based on the additional evidences and directed a thorough review to determine the legitimacy of the deposits. The judgment highlighted the importance of substantiated claims and thorough examination to ensure a just outcome in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>