<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1138 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254795</link>
    <description>The appeal regarding the admissibility of a refund claim under Notification No. 41/2007-ST was rejected by the appellate tribunal. The appellant failed to provide necessary documents and meet prescribed conditions to support the claim, leading to the rejection both on merits and for non-prosecution. The tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authorities, emphasizing the importance of complying with specified conditions and producing essential documentary evidence for refund claims under the relevant notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 11:53:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1138 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254795</link>
      <description>The appeal regarding the admissibility of a refund claim under Notification No. 41/2007-ST was rejected by the appellate tribunal. The appellant failed to provide necessary documents and meet prescribed conditions to support the claim, leading to the rejection both on merits and for non-prosecution. The tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authorities, emphasizing the importance of complying with specified conditions and producing essential documentary evidence for refund claims under the relevant notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>