<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1128 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254785</link>
    <description>The government concluded that the rebate should be calculated based on the effective rate of duty (4% or 5%) as per Notification No. 4/06-CE. The decision to recredit the excess duty to the Cenvat account was upheld, and the revision applications were rejected. The orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) were found to be in compliance with CBEC instructions and legal precedents, ensuring consistency and adherence to statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1128 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254785</link>
      <description>The government concluded that the rebate should be calculated based on the effective rate of duty (4% or 5%) as per Notification No. 4/06-CE. The decision to recredit the excess duty to the Cenvat account was upheld, and the revision applications were rejected. The orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) were found to be in compliance with CBEC instructions and legal precedents, ensuring consistency and adherence to statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>