<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1103 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254760</link>
    <description>The Assessee appealed against the disallowance of depreciation claimed on a car and TV owned by directors but used by the company. The ITAT held that if assets were funded by the company and reflected in its balance sheet, the company could be considered the de facto owner, allowing depreciation claims. The decision aligned with previous rulings, granting the Assessee&#039;s appeal for depreciation on the assets in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 21:17:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1103 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254760</link>
      <description>The Assessee appealed against the disallowance of depreciation claimed on a car and TV owned by directors but used by the company. The ITAT held that if assets were funded by the company and reflected in its balance sheet, the company could be considered the de facto owner, allowing depreciation claims. The decision aligned with previous rulings, granting the Assessee&#039;s appeal for depreciation on the assets in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>