<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1095 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254752</link>
    <description>Service tax paid on an activity outside the levy was refundable where the claimant showed that the burden had not been passed on to customers. The authorities could not defeat the claim by mechanical reliance on limitation or by invoking a later departmental circular that had been withdrawn and was inapplicable. The Court found the refund decision had not been examined objectively and directed refund of the unpaid amount with interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 15:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1095 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254752</link>
      <description>Service tax paid on an activity outside the levy was refundable where the claimant showed that the burden had not been passed on to customers. The authorities could not defeat the claim by mechanical reliance on limitation or by invoking a later departmental circular that had been withdrawn and was inapplicable. The Court found the refund decision had not been examined objectively and directed refund of the unpaid amount with interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>