<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1091 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254748</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a Service Tax liability assessment order due to the lack of reasonable cause presented. Emphasizing the importance of due diligence in prosecuting litigation, the Tribunal highlighted that absence of mala fides is not the sole criterion for condonation of delay. Consequently, both the condonation application and the appeal were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 09:02:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1091 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254748</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a Service Tax liability assessment order due to the lack of reasonable cause presented. Emphasizing the importance of due diligence in prosecuting litigation, the Tribunal highlighted that absence of mala fides is not the sole criterion for condonation of delay. Consequently, both the condonation application and the appeal were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>