<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1069 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254726</link>
    <description>Whether sale of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR)/additional FSI constitutes a capital asset chargeable to capital gains tax. Relying on the principle that a capital asset must be &quot;capable of acquisition at a cost&quot; (Cadell precedent) and on ITAT precedent, the court found the additional FSI/TDR was generated by the land under development control rules and had no ascertainable cost of acquisition; amendments to s.55(2)(a) regarding tenancy rights did not render the right an acquired asset here. Consequence: the gains were not taxable as long-term capital gains and the Tribunal&#039;s order upholding non-chargeability is affirmed against Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1069 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254726</link>
      <description>Whether sale of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR)/additional FSI constitutes a capital asset chargeable to capital gains tax. Relying on the principle that a capital asset must be &quot;capable of acquisition at a cost&quot; (Cadell precedent) and on ITAT precedent, the court found the additional FSI/TDR was generated by the land under development control rules and had no ascertainable cost of acquisition; amendments to s.55(2)(a) regarding tenancy rights did not render the right an acquired asset here. Consequence: the gains were not taxable as long-term capital gains and the Tribunal&#039;s order upholding non-chargeability is affirmed against Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>