<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (11) TMI 157 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167647</link>
    <description>A settlement under the Industrial Disputes Act remains binding after notice of termination and does not create a legal vacuum; it continues to govern service conditions until replaced by a fresh settlement, award, or other valid legal instrument. The Life Insurance Corporation Act, including section 11, section 49 and Regulation 58, could not override the protected industrial settlements, because the Industrial Disputes Act operates as the special law in the field of industrial disputes. The 1974 settlements therefore continued to regulate bonus and other service conditions, and the impugned notices and regulation could not extinguish the workmen&#039;s bonus rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:14:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (11) TMI 157 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167647</link>
      <description>A settlement under the Industrial Disputes Act remains binding after notice of termination and does not create a legal vacuum; it continues to govern service conditions until replaced by a fresh settlement, award, or other valid legal instrument. The Life Insurance Corporation Act, including section 11, section 49 and Regulation 58, could not override the protected industrial settlements, because the Industrial Disputes Act operates as the special law in the field of industrial disputes. The 1974 settlements therefore continued to regulate bonus and other service conditions, and the impugned notices and regulation could not extinguish the workmen&#039;s bonus rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>