<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (9) TMI 173 - COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167622</link>
    <description>The appeal by a manufacturer of Electric Fans against the rejection of a refund claim of excise duty was partially allowed. The court held that excise duty should be levied on the net amount realized at the factory gate upon the sale of electric fans, excluding certain post-manufacturing expenses. The assessable value for excise duty should only include manufacturing cost and profits, disallowing deductions for expenses like packing, freight, and the cost of the fan regulator. Specific expenses like godown rent, insurance charges, and administrative expenses related to sales organizations were allowed as deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:45:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (9) TMI 173 - COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167622</link>
      <description>The appeal by a manufacturer of Electric Fans against the rejection of a refund claim of excise duty was partially allowed. The court held that excise duty should be levied on the net amount realized at the factory gate upon the sale of electric fans, excluding certain post-manufacturing expenses. The assessable value for excise duty should only include manufacturing cost and profits, disallowing deductions for expenses like packing, freight, and the cost of the fan regulator. Specific expenses like godown rent, insurance charges, and administrative expenses related to sales organizations were allowed as deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>