<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1051 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254708</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to uphold the penalty under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, finding the appellant liable for involvement in attempted illegal export of restricted goods. The court dismissed the appeal, as the appellant&#039;s complicity was supported by substantial evidence, and no errors were found in the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1051 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254708</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to uphold the penalty under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, finding the appellant liable for involvement in attempted illegal export of restricted goods. The court dismissed the appeal, as the appellant&#039;s complicity was supported by substantial evidence, and no errors were found in the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>