https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254697 Service tax demand for the disputed period was treated as barred by limitation because the assessee was operating under valid State Government permission as a university. On that factual basis, its conduct was not treated as showing any intent to evade tax, so the extended limitation period could not be invoked. The impugned order granting relief was sustained and the Revenue's challenge failed. en-us Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Dec 2014 08:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254697 Service tax demand for the disputed period was treated as barred by limitation because the assessee was operating under valid State Government permission as a university. On that factual basis, its conduct was not treated as showing any intent to evade tax, so the extended limitation period could not be invoked. The impugned order granting relief was sustained and the Revenue's challenge failed. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254697