<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1034 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254691</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants&#039; process of diluting and repacking chemical products amounted to manufacture, creating new products with distinct characteristics. The final products were classified under the appropriate tariff heading and deemed excisable, subject to duty. The duty liability computation was to consider the selling price as cum duty price. The penalty imposed was set aside due to the appellants&#039; genuine conduct and the nature of the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1034 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254691</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants&#039; process of diluting and repacking chemical products amounted to manufacture, creating new products with distinct characteristics. The final products were classified under the appropriate tariff heading and deemed excisable, subject to duty. The duty liability computation was to consider the selling price as cum duty price. The penalty imposed was set aside due to the appellants&#039; genuine conduct and the nature of the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>