<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1030 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254687</link>
    <description>An exemption under Notification No. 4/2006-C.E. covered sulphuric acid used in the manufacture of fertilizers where the notification defined &quot;fertilizers&quot; by reference to the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985. Prior Tribunal rulings had treated zinc sulphate as covered by that Order and had held that exemption cannot be denied merely because the final product is classified under a tariff heading other than the fertilizer chapter, if the notification does not impose such a classification . On that reasoning, the exemption was available and the Revenue&#039;s objection based on Chapter 28 classification failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 06:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1030 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254687</link>
      <description>An exemption under Notification No. 4/2006-C.E. covered sulphuric acid used in the manufacture of fertilizers where the notification defined &quot;fertilizers&quot; by reference to the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985. Prior Tribunal rulings had treated zinc sulphate as covered by that Order and had held that exemption cannot be denied merely because the final product is classified under a tariff heading other than the fertilizer chapter, if the notification does not impose such a classification . On that reasoning, the exemption was available and the Revenue&#039;s objection based on Chapter 28 classification failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>