https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254686 The tribunal set aside the confiscation of excess chewing tobacco due to insufficient evidence of clandestine removal or intent. The penalty imposed on the manufacturing unit was also overturned as the appellant's claim of unfinished goods was not supported by expert tests. The appeal succeeded, with the penalty for the partner being revoked, and consequential relief granted to the appellant. en-us Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Dec 2014 06:54:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254686 The tribunal set aside the confiscation of excess chewing tobacco due to insufficient evidence of clandestine removal or intent. The penalty imposed on the manufacturing unit was also overturned as the appellant's claim of unfinished goods was not supported by expert tests. The appeal succeeded, with the penalty for the partner being revoked, and consequential relief granted to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254686