<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Updates about provision relating to service tax audit- Amended rule 5A also seems to be ultravirse and invalid provision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5977</link>
    <description>The substituted Rule 5A(2) and Circular require that every assessee make specified records available on demand to authorised officers, audit parties deputed by the Commissioner, the Comptroller and Auditor General, or nominated chartered/cost accountants within a specified time. The author argues this remains a general on demand audit power like the earlier provision quashed in Travelite (India), and that because Section 72A authorises only a circumscribed special audit with safeguards, rules under Section 94 cannot validly broaden audit scope; therefore the amended rule and circular may still be ultra vires absent specific reasons and procedural safeguards including opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 06:50:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:42:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Updates about provision relating to service tax audit- Amended rule 5A also seems to be ultravirse and invalid provision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5977</link>
      <description>The substituted Rule 5A(2) and Circular require that every assessee make specified records available on demand to authorised officers, audit parties deputed by the Commissioner, the Comptroller and Auditor General, or nominated chartered/cost accountants within a specified time. The author argues this remains a general on demand audit power like the earlier provision quashed in Travelite (India), and that because Section 72A authorises only a circumscribed special audit with safeguards, rules under Section 94 cannot validly broaden audit scope; therefore the amended rule and circular may still be ultra vires absent specific reasons and procedural safeguards including opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 06:50:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>