<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1017 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254674</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing both the Assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals regarding the valuation of written off moulds and unaccounted sales. The decision emphasized the need for concrete evidence and accurate accounting of assets in the books. Ultimately, the Tribunal found no substantial proof to challenge the initial assessment, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1017 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254674</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, dismissing both the Assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals regarding the valuation of written off moulds and unaccounted sales. The decision emphasized the need for concrete evidence and accurate accounting of assets in the books. Ultimately, the Tribunal found no substantial proof to challenge the initial assessment, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>