<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1012 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254669</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the addition of undisclosed income based on purchases from M/s Gian Chand Ramji Dass Group but deleting the addition related to peak credit in bank accounts. The assessee&#039;s cross objection challenging the initiation of block assessment was restored for fresh consideration. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation, ensuring the assessee&#039;s right to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 19:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1012 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254669</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the addition of undisclosed income based on purchases from M/s Gian Chand Ramji Dass Group but deleting the addition related to peak credit in bank accounts. The assessee&#039;s cross objection challenging the initiation of block assessment was restored for fresh consideration. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation, ensuring the assessee&#039;s right to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>