<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1002 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254659</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal granted the appellant a stay against the recovery of dues and penalties, allowing them to avail the credit of Service Tax paid on insurance services until the appeal is resolved. The decision was based on the ownership of the properties by the appellant and the absence of evidence indicating ownership by any other party, aligning with the precedents cited in support of the appellant&#039;s case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 18:22:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1002 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254659</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal granted the appellant a stay against the recovery of dues and penalties, allowing them to avail the credit of Service Tax paid on insurance services until the appeal is resolved. The decision was based on the ownership of the properties by the appellant and the absence of evidence indicating ownership by any other party, aligning with the precedents cited in support of the appellant&#039;s case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>