https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254653 The appellate authority initially ruled in favor of the applicant regarding rebate claims but later sided with the department due to fraudulent CENVAT credit claims. Discrepancies in show cause notices led to remanding cases for fresh decisions. The government emphasized correcting factual errors before addressing rebate claim implications. The jurisdictional issue raised by the applicant was noted, but the focus remained on rectifying factual discrepancies before further proceedings. en-us Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254653 The appellate authority initially ruled in favor of the applicant regarding rebate claims but later sided with the department due to fraudulent CENVAT credit claims. Discrepancies in show cause notices led to remanding cases for fresh decisions. The government emphasized correcting factual errors before addressing rebate claim implications. The jurisdictional issue raised by the applicant was noted, but the focus remained on rectifying factual discrepancies before further proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254653