<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 994 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254651</link>
    <description>The Government, after reviewing evidence presented by M/s Tricon Enterprises (P) Ltd., allowed the Revision Application in a case concerning the rejection of rebate claims due to non-submission of central excise invoices. Despite initial inadmissibility, the Government ruled in favor of the applicants, emphasizing the fulfillment of rebate conditions and the substantive fact of export. Citing legal principles and the export-oriented nature of rebate schemes, the Government highlighted the importance of not unduly restricting benefits based on procedural lapses, ultimately setting aside the original rejection and ruling in favor of the applicants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 994 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254651</link>
      <description>The Government, after reviewing evidence presented by M/s Tricon Enterprises (P) Ltd., allowed the Revision Application in a case concerning the rejection of rebate claims due to non-submission of central excise invoices. Despite initial inadmissibility, the Government ruled in favor of the applicants, emphasizing the fulfillment of rebate conditions and the substantive fact of export. Citing legal principles and the export-oriented nature of rebate schemes, the Government highlighted the importance of not unduly restricting benefits based on procedural lapses, ultimately setting aside the original rejection and ruling in favor of the applicants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>