<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 981 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254638</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal regarding the investment allowance under Section 32A, finding no substantial question of law. For the disallowance of interest under Section 36(1)(iii), the High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, noting that the issue had been conclusively resolved in favor of the assessee in previous judgments. Thus, the appeal was dismissed, and the questions were answered in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2014 07:50:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 981 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254638</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal regarding the investment allowance under Section 32A, finding no substantial question of law. For the disallowance of interest under Section 36(1)(iii), the High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, noting that the issue had been conclusively resolved in favor of the assessee in previous judgments. Thus, the appeal was dismissed, and the questions were answered in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>