<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (8) TMI 161 - COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DEHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167613</link>
    <description>Semi-processed grey art silk fabrics that had not reached the stage of excisability could not attract excise duty, and their alleged shortage during processing did not amount to a contravention under Rule 9(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. R.G. 1 was meant for manufactured and fully finished goods, so there was no requirement to enter grey fabrics in that register alongside finished stock. The explanation that prescribed appendices and loss records were impracticable to maintain was accepted, particularly where the assessed loss was minimal at about 0.1%. The excise proceedings were therefore not sustainable against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 14:41:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (8) TMI 161 - COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DEHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167613</link>
      <description>Semi-processed grey art silk fabrics that had not reached the stage of excisability could not attract excise duty, and their alleged shortage during processing did not amount to a contravention under Rule 9(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. R.G. 1 was meant for manufactured and fully finished goods, so there was no requirement to enter grey fabrics in that register alongside finished stock. The explanation that prescribed appendices and loss records were impracticable to maintain was accepted, particularly where the assessed loss was minimal at about 0.1%. The excise proceedings were therefore not sustainable against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>