<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (8) TMI 153 - COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167606</link>
    <description>Microporous PVC battery separators cut to size were examined by their manufacturing process and chemical composition, including ribs, webs and sintered microporous structure. Because the goods functioned as insulation between battery plates while permitting acid passage through porosity, they were treated as finished battery-use articles rather than mere rigid PVC sheeting. On that basis, the earlier classification under Item 15A(2) as rigid PVC sheets was rejected, and the goods were classified as articles made of plastic. The product was accordingly held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 68/71 dated 02-05-1971.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 11:38:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (8) TMI 153 - COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167606</link>
      <description>Microporous PVC battery separators cut to size were examined by their manufacturing process and chemical composition, including ribs, webs and sintered microporous structure. Because the goods functioned as insulation between battery plates while permitting acid passage through porosity, they were treated as finished battery-use articles rather than mere rigid PVC sheeting. On that basis, the earlier classification under Item 15A(2) as rigid PVC sheets was rejected, and the goods were classified as articles made of plastic. The product was accordingly held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 68/71 dated 02-05-1971.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>