<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (8) TMI 160 - COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167605</link>
    <description>Refund of central excise duty could not be denied on the ground that the duty burden had not been passed on to consumers, because the relevant exemption notification contained no such condition. The rejection of the refund claim on that basis was held unsustainable, and the claim was required to be examined on its own merits. A refund under an exemption notification cannot be refused by importing a condition not found in the notification itself.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 11:12:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (8) TMI 160 - COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167605</link>
      <description>Refund of central excise duty could not be denied on the ground that the duty burden had not been passed on to consumers, because the relevant exemption notification contained no such condition. The rejection of the refund claim on that basis was held unsustainable, and the claim was required to be examined on its own merits. A refund under an exemption notification cannot be refused by importing a condition not found in the notification itself.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>