<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 964 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254621</link>
    <description>The High Court restored the Appeal seeking waiver of predeposit of Service Tax and penalties, remanding the issue to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merits. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) had not decided the issue on merit but dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with the predeposit requirement. The case was remitted for a detailed examination without insisting on predeposit, emphasizing the need for a thorough evaluation to determine the classification of services provided as &#039;Consulting Engineer&#039;s Services&#039;. Both parties were granted the opportunity to present evidence, and the Appeal was allowed via remand, with the Stay Petition disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 964 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254621</link>
      <description>The High Court restored the Appeal seeking waiver of predeposit of Service Tax and penalties, remanding the issue to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on merits. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) had not decided the issue on merit but dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with the predeposit requirement. The case was remitted for a detailed examination without insisting on predeposit, emphasizing the need for a thorough evaluation to determine the classification of services provided as &#039;Consulting Engineer&#039;s Services&#039;. Both parties were granted the opportunity to present evidence, and the Appeal was allowed via remand, with the Stay Petition disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>