<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 954 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254611</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction may be invoked despite an alternate appellate remedy where the assessment process shows non-consideration of relevant material, lack of reasons, or breach of natural justice. The text distinguishes reassessment under section 27(1)(a) from best judgment assessment, while noting that best judgment principles still inform the exercise of reassessment power. It also states that equal addition for alleged scrap suppression needs supporting material and a rational basis, export sales of capital assets require proper examination of export documents, penalty under section 27(3) depends on wilful non-disclosure, and a specific tariff entry prevails over a general one for mobile phone accessories.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 954 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254611</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction may be invoked despite an alternate appellate remedy where the assessment process shows non-consideration of relevant material, lack of reasons, or breach of natural justice. The text distinguishes reassessment under section 27(1)(a) from best judgment assessment, while noting that best judgment principles still inform the exercise of reassessment power. It also states that equal addition for alleged scrap suppression needs supporting material and a rational basis, export sales of capital assets require proper examination of export documents, penalty under section 27(3) depends on wilful non-disclosure, and a specific tariff entry prevails over a general one for mobile phone accessories.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>