<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 943 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254600</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, upholding the denial of a specific Cenvat credit amount with interest but setting aside the penalty under Section 11AC. The judgment emphasized compliance with Cenvat credit rules and the implications of claiming credit on inputs used in exempted final products.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 943 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254600</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, upholding the denial of a specific Cenvat credit amount with interest but setting aside the penalty under Section 11AC. The judgment emphasized compliance with Cenvat credit rules and the implications of claiming credit on inputs used in exempted final products.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>