<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (7) TMI 163 - CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE &amp; CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167596</link>
    <description>An exemption notification could not be denied solely because the assessee&#039;s manufacturing licence was not renewed for the relevant period, where the clearances remained within the prescribed exemption limit and the other notification conditions were otherwise satisfied. The document further states that manufacture without a valid licence, arising from late renewal, was treated as a technical breach rather than a duty-evasion case, so the penalty and confiscation were considered excessive. Relief was therefore granted on the exemption issue, and the penal consequences were reduced, with release of the goods ordered without redemption fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 10:37:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (7) TMI 163 - CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE &amp; CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167596</link>
      <description>An exemption notification could not be denied solely because the assessee&#039;s manufacturing licence was not renewed for the relevant period, where the clearances remained within the prescribed exemption limit and the other notification conditions were otherwise satisfied. The document further states that manufacture without a valid licence, arising from late renewal, was treated as a technical breach rather than a duty-evasion case, so the penalty and confiscation were considered excessive. Relief was therefore granted on the exemption issue, and the penal consequences were reduced, with release of the goods ordered without redemption fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>