<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 933 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254590</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, and remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for reevaluation. The Tribunal was directed to consider the nature and purpose of the sales tax subsidy in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment and then decide whether it should be treated as a capital or revenue expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:25:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 933 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254590</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, and remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for reevaluation. The Tribunal was directed to consider the nature and purpose of the sales tax subsidy in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment and then decide whether it should be treated as a capital or revenue expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>