<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 230 - COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167582</link>
    <description>The product was found to be completely soluble in water and incapable of forming an emulsion, so it did not answer the description of an emulsifier or wetting out agent. On that factual basis, exemption under Notification No. 101/66 was unavailable, and the duty levy and the Assistant Collector&#039;s action were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 12:57:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 230 - COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167582</link>
      <description>The product was found to be completely soluble in water and incapable of forming an emulsion, so it did not answer the description of an emulsifier or wetting out agent. On that factual basis, exemption under Notification No. 101/66 was unavailable, and the duty levy and the Assistant Collector&#039;s action were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>