<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 297 - CEGAT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167577</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals) decision in favor of M/s. Indian Organic Chemicals Ltd., allowing their claim for duty credit under Rule 56AA(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, despite a factory closure during the incentive period. The Tribunal emphasized the comparison of quantities cleared during the relevant periods as per Notification No. 283/82, rejecting arguments focusing on production over clearances. The decision highlighted the deliberate language choice in the notification, supporting the duty concession based on clearances rather than production, and directed implementation within three months from the judgment date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 11:49:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 297 - CEGAT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167577</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals) decision in favor of M/s. Indian Organic Chemicals Ltd., allowing their claim for duty credit under Rule 56AA(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, despite a factory closure during the incentive period. The Tribunal emphasized the comparison of quantities cleared during the relevant periods as per Notification No. 283/82, rejecting arguments focusing on production over clearances. The decision highlighted the deliberate language choice in the notification, supporting the duty concession based on clearances rather than production, and directed implementation within three months from the judgment date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=167577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>